Letters/Opinions:
A source of Association leaders
At the end of last year, Washington gained 235 National Board
certified teachers. We now have a total of 581 in the state.
This comes at a time when the WEA and local associations are
having a hard time finding new people to fill important leadership
roles. My association, for example, hasn’t had a bonafide
election with competing candidates for executive board positions
since I can remember. And these same people also make up the
bargaining team. Not that these members are doing a poor job
(after all, I’m one of them), but they could sure use
an infusion of new people, eager to take on leadership roles.
I think the answer is right in front of our face. I strongly
believe that Washington state’s National Board certified
teachers are well qualified to fill the growing leadership
vacuum in our state and local education associations.
The National Board and the Association value quality schools,
quality teaching and quality working conditions. The Association
has worked hard to get more collegial time so that teachers
can work together to plan units and lessons. The National
Board sees this as vital for effective schools. The WEA has
been able to get smaller class sizes so that students can
get more attention from their teachers. My local Association
has been able to secure greater influence in regard to planning
professional development that is more meaningful for teachers
and their students, another item prominent on the National
Board agenda. And the Association has also had limited success
in obtaining adequate compensation, essential to attracting
and retaining accomplished teachers, whether or not they’re
Board Certified.
The National Board and the WEA share the same goals. They
understand the need for the state to fully fund the school
system. They realize that adequate compensation will attract
and retain good teachers and lead to increased student learning.
In short, the Association and the National Board have the
same agenda.
The NEA has supported the National Board since it began in
the mid-’80s, as a response to a perceived crisis in
American education. These teachers and educational leaders
articulated a set of standards to which all teachers could
aspire, and have since certified over 30,000 teachers who
have demonstrated that they meet those standards. This board
consists primarily of teachers, in recognition of the fact
that those who teach are the ones who best understand teaching.
Currently, this board also includes NEA President Reg Weaver
and Lake Washington Education Association President Kevin
Teeley.
In Washington, the WEA has worked alongside the OSPI to support
teachers who pursue certification. This support comes in many
forms, including the recruitment of prospective candidates,
organizational and financial support of facilitated candidate
study groups, and a yearly, weeklong symposium that gives
new candidates a jump start on their certification process.
It has also insisted that while every teacher should aspire
to the National Board’s standards, the certification
process should remain entirely voluntary. Additionally, the
WEA has consistently and successfully lobbied for a substantial
annual stipend for those teachers who attain certification.
Where I think the Association falls short in respect to NBCTs
is what it does, or rather, doesn’t do, with them after
they certify. Accomplished teachers have great potential as
leaders in the Association. They understand good teaching,
they think and care deeply about educational quality, and
can articulate this passion in a clear and compelling manner.
They also have the proven ability to finish difficult tasks,
and the desire to take on leadership roles without leaving
the classroom. NBCTs should become building representatives
at their schools. They should be on the executive boards of
their local associations. They should speak up for educational
issues in Olympia on behalf of the WEA. They should be on
their district bargaining teams, and they should be delegates
at the state and national representative assemblies.
And if they don’t step forward to take on these roles,
the Association and local leaders need to step forward and
recruit them. The WEA should enlist these teachers to speak
to the Legislature about the need for adequate support of
education. National Board Certification has prepared them
to become teacher leaders, to make a difference within and
beyond their classroom walls. The Association could, and should,
give them the structure to do just that.
Tom White is a National Board
certified teacher and teaches fourth grade at Lynnwood Intermediate
School.
|
Not my view
Editor:
Shortly after the recent election, Democrats advised President
Bush that he needed to "reach out" to those who
voted against him. I’m wondering if that isn’t
good advice for the WEA. Our leadership needs to face the
unpleasant fact (for them) that a large number (I’ll
bet as much as a third) of the membership voted for several
and many, nearly all, of the candidates and ballot measures
WEA did not endorse.
While WEA prides itself on its "diversity" and
"inclusiveness," these qualities stop at the precinct
caucus and the polling place. For many years, those of us
who vote predominately Republican have been made to feel beyond
the pale. This intolerance reaches from the state leadership
to the local level and reaches the level of near harassment
of those who do not agree with many positions taken by the
leadership. Would the WEA tolerate similar harassment of those
of different ethnic groups or genders?
Earlier this year, we received, in the "WEA Legislative
Update," an announcement that WEA was carefully considering
the different candidates and would announce endorsements shortly.
Except for a token Republican, usually in a minor or meaningless
office, we all know who will be recommended. I felt my intelligence
was insulted by these pretend "political evaluations."
As another example, I offer the latest copy of "WE"
that came shortly before the election. Several teachers were
polled on their political views and Surprise! ALL were against
charter schools, favored Christine Gregoire and took pokes
at President Bush.
It has been suggested that Democrats spend some time re-examining
their beliefs and how they determine their platform; it is
high time that WEA does the same. WEA would fight strongly
against any attempt to force different values on its members.
It needs to quit forcing its political values on those of
us who don’t agree in the same way, both at the state
and local level.
Richard R. Slater
Arlington EA
|
Write us!
We encourage members of Washington’s public
school community to share their views. Signed letters from WEA members
and staff will be printed on a space-available basis. Letters should
deal with an issue of interest to WEA members; personal attacks
will not be published.
To submit your letter, please send e-mail to lwoo@washingtonea.org
and include "Letter to the editor" in the subject line,
or send U.S. mail to Letters, WE-Washington Education, P.O. Box
9100, Federal Way, WA 98063-9100. Please include your name and your
local education association's name, plus a daytime phone number
for verification.
Letters should be limited to about 350 words; publishing
decisions rest solely with the WEA and submissions may be edited
for space. Letters and guest editorials reflect the personal opinions
of individual members and do not necessarily reflect WEA's policies
or goals.
Share
your thoughts & ideas!
Reach WEA Editor Linda Woo at lwoo@WashingtonEA.org,
via postal mail at WEA, PO Box 9100, Federal Way, WA 98063-9100;
phone 253-765-7027 (or toll-free outside Seattle-Tacoma: 800-622-3393
ext. 7027); or fax 253-946-7612. We welcome story ideas, letters
to the editor and suggestions for improving WE-Washington Education,
or WEA Online.
|
 |
|